I submitted the application, and everything was quite clear and straightforward. However, I encountered one issue. I created a banner for the profile header myself, tailored to the format required during the application process. After my application passed moderation, I noticed that the banner is displayed incorrectly on some monitors (not at full scale). Adjusting the scale in the browser settings resolves this issue. From this, I conclude that the banner adaptation on the website is not functioning correctly. I kindly ask you to look into this and, if possible, resolve the problem before the voting period begins.
I would like my infographic to be visible in the banner.
Hello and amazing job team. For the next RAF I would suggest a better ending date than the weekend, as support for technical queries might be unavailable by the weekend. Asides this everything went quite well for me.
RAF1 was a fantastic experience!
Getting hands-on with smart contracts was incredibly valuable, and I believe this interactive approach will be highly beneficial for other users as well.
However, I did face one challenge—the “Approve” button was missing at the final step, which left me stuck.
Thankfully, Eliza pointed out that a small amount of Ethereum on the OP chain is required for the button to appear. Once I added some ETH to the OP chain, the button became visible, and I was able to proceed smoothly.
To improve the experience for future applicants, it would be great to have a clear message notifying users that OP Ethereum is needed for gas fees. This would help prevent confusion and make the process even more seamless.
Overall, RAF1 was a great experience, and I truly appreciate the opportunity! Looking forward to seeing even more refinements in the future.
I’d like to thank Eliza from the Obol team, who was instrumental in helping us submit our application. She consistently offered assistance and clarity, and without her support, our submission wouldn’t have been the same. We truly appreciate the way you engage with the community and stay informed about the projects that use Obol in any capacity. This level of customer care really stands out and makes us even more satisfied to be working with you.
Thank you for offering the opportunity to provide feedback on the RAF1 application process.
Smoothness of the Application Form: Overall, the application form was straightforward to navigate. However, a few areas could benefit from clarification to reduce potential confusion. For instance, it would be helpful if the instructions for submitting impact metrics were more explicit, particularly regarding the format for URLs and numerical data. Adding tooltips or example inputs might further simplify the process.
Finding Necessary Details: We did not encounter significant difficulties locating the information needed to complete the application. However, a more detailed guide or a quick reference for what qualifies as a “project impact” could be valuable, particularly for projects like ours that are more focused on community and developer engagement. This would help ensure we’re framing our contributions accurately.
Suggestions for Improvement:
A clearer breakdown of what qualifies for each impact category would be great.
A summary or checklist at the end of the form to ensure all necessary sections have been completed could help avoid any last-minute oversights.
Including a “Save Progress” option could be useful for larger projects that require gathering external data before final submission.
We look forward to seeing the continuous improvements and appreciate the efforts to streamline the RAF1 process. Thanks again for the platform and the opportunity to share our feedback!