Thanks everyone for the feedback here.
On the reporting cadence, the goal is to find the right balance between commitment to transparency and flexibility to execute. That’s why, out of the two options proposed, we went for the quarterly format: it gives us a fixed, recurring milestone while allowing enough time for meaningful progress between reports. It doesn’t mean we’ll go silent in between though. You’ve already seen interim updates through proposals like this new one, and we’ll keep doing that whenever there’s concrete progress to share.
That said, the structure of the quarterly report is absolutely open for input. We’d love to see the community propose topics, metrics, or sections that should be included. In our view, the first one could come at the end of the year, as a natural wrap-up and forward look, but we’re open to community suggestions on what it should cover.
This is a collective effort not something the Association wants to define unilaterally, so feel free to drop ideas.