# PGov Delegate Thread

**URL:** <https://community.obol.org/t/pgov-delegate-thread/615>\
**Category:** Delegates\
**Created:** [July 2, 2025, 6:36pm UTC](https://community.obol.org/t/pgov-delegate-thread/615 "2025-07-02T18:36:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/community.obol.org/pgov/32/132_2.png) [@PGov](https://community.obol.org/u/PGov)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2025, 6:36pm UTC](https://community.obol.org/t/pgov-delegate-thread/615/1 "2025-07-02T18:36:57Z")

</div>

## PGov Delegate Thread

Delegate Address: PGov.eth  
Email: [PGovTeam@gmail.com](mailto:PGovTeam@gmail.com)  
Twitter: @PGovTeam

Hello everyone! We are a team of dedicated governance enthusiasts who have been in the governance space for over four years. Our team were some of the first members involved in defi governance and we want to apply what we have learned over the years to Obol.

Core Values:

- Growth: Our decisions are primarily focused on the growth of the protocol. This often results in how to spend money efficiently, but even more importantly and objecting for unreasonable spends and knowing when to vote no.
- Transparency: Clear communication with votes and explanations of reasoning, and an equivalent demand for proposals to do the same. Too often we see thousands, if not millions, being rolled up together and glossed over during proposals.
- Accountability: Too often once a decision is done, having proper accountability becomes an afterthought. Whether it’s a DAO promise or a grant or a new program, once a DAO votes something in, we forget about it. Our goal with PGov is to both continue to check in on these decisions as well as ensure that there are proper channels set up to ensure accountability

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/community.obol.org/pgov/32/132_2.png) [@PGov](https://community.obol.org/u/PGov)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2025, 6:41pm UTC](https://community.obol.org/t/pgov-delegate-thread/615/2 "2025-07-02T18:41:04Z")

</div>

**[OIP #4 Delegate Compensation and Delegate Reputation Score Integration (stOBOL)](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/obol/proposal/20181634516748464451610248211159268435895719937634767398559286055659757648365)**

We voted **Abstain** : Voting abstain for COI reasons here and there is some debates ongoing. No substantial concerns

EDIT: With recent discussions, we agree with the quadratic formula to distribute incentives

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/community.obol.org/pgov/32/132_2.png) [@PGov](https://community.obol.org/u/PGov)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2025, 10:26pm UTC](https://community.obol.org/t/pgov-delegate-thread/615/3 "2025-07-04T22:26:01Z")

</div>

**[OIP#5 Extension of the Airdrop Claim Period for Eligible Participant](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/obol/proposal/29483747347520500834458432109641193798720743379553989524502910046223092148985)**

We voted **Against** : We think teams have sufficient time to claim their airdrops and there is no need to extend it. These unclaimed tokens can then be used in other places.

**[OIP#6 Assigning the Cancel Role to the Obol Association](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/obol/proposal/100136572429972201092399149325653021919410159214443100676789892534723828331825)**

WE voted **For** : It makes for the team to have a role like this. The multisig, while composition not ideal, we are ok with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/community.obol.org/pgov/32/132_2.png) [@PGov](https://community.obol.org/u/PGov)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 2:49am UTC](https://community.obol.org/t/pgov-delegate-thread/615/4 "2025-07-14T02:49:23Z")

</div>

**[Shutdown of the Obol Association.](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/obol/proposal/32504350208480767391151542783499364403443409201326889841232314732024247001145)**

We voted **Against** : Hiccups and issues are set to happen. We think it is still way to early to make a decision here if we want to completely restart the association and related activities.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PGov](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/community.obol.org/pgov/32/132_2.png) [@PGov](https://community.obol.org/u/PGov)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2025, 4:42pm UTC](https://community.obol.org/t/pgov-delegate-thread/615/5 "2025-11-10T16:42:45Z")

</div>

**[OIP#7 Staking Rewards Extension & Transition Toward Programmatic Revenue Sharing](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/obol/proposal/77455170698122364914470908839673396624399584829579240642780337887413157214700)**

We voted **For** : Excited to see this transition to a more fleshed out revenue driven model.

> [@OIP#7: Staking Rewards Extension & Transition Toward Programmatic Protocol Revenue Sharing](https://community.obol.org/t/oip-7-staking-rewards-extension-transition-toward-programmatic-protocol-revenue-sharing/719/38):
>
> We voted For We see this as am important step to get to Obol’s next phase of token utility. A two-month rewards extension provides staker reward continuity, and should allow for steady inflows/outflows. A move from pre-allocated emissions to more sustainable, revenue-driven model is also particularly interesting.
